← All writingOn pricing

The price is the whole price.

A broadband price should help you make a decision. That means showing the commitment, not just the most attractive number.

The number that matters

When someone asks what broadband costs, they aren’t asking for the smallest number we can put on a page. They’re trying to work out whether it fits their life and their budget.

That sounds obvious. But a starting price only answers part of the question. How long does it last? What comes after it? Is there a setup charge? What am I agreeing to pay over the term?

Those details belong together. If a customer has to assemble the real offer from a headline, a footnote and another page, we’ve made the comparison harder than it needs to be.

Certainty has value

My preference is a price someone can rely on for the term they choose. A commitment should give both sides something useful: the provider gets a customer for an agreed period; the customer gets a deal they can plan around.

I know that providing broadband has costs. Networks, equipment and support don’t pay for themselves. That is a reason to think carefully about the price we set and the commitments we make.

If the price is going to change, I want the amount and timing alongside the starting price, before the customer decides. Being able to find the information eventually is a lower standard than making it easy to understand.

The headline should explain the deal, not leave the customer to reconstruct it.

Make the trade-offs visible

A rolling agreement and a longer contract don’t have to have the same price. Flexibility can be a different proposition. What matters is being able to compare those propositions fairly.

I’d want to see the monthly price, the term, any upfront cost and any planned price changes in the same place. Then I can decide whether a lower monthly bill is worth a longer commitment to me.

A customer who values flexibility isn’t making a bad decision by choosing it. Nor is someone who prefers a longer agreement. Clear information lets people choose for themselves.

The standard I’d apply

My test is simple: could someone explain the agreement back in their own words after reading the offer? What they pay, how long they stay and what changes along the way.

That’s the kind of clarity I want from this industry. And because I’m building a provider, it’s a question I have to ask of my own work too.

A good price isn’t only a competitive number. It’s a number the customer understands.

Liam Mulryan

This is my personal position, not a statement of current Olilo prices, contract terms or support commitments.

The wider argument

Clear prices, a service that delivers and a genuine choice of commitment belong together.

Read about customer choice

See it differently?

I’m interested in where you agree, and where you’d challenge this.

Send me your take