← All writingOn service

A service that earns its bill.

If a customer is expected to keep their side of the agreement, the provider should take its side just as seriously.

Both sides of the bargain

Paying for a service that doesn’t deliver is one of the things that frustrates me most about broadband. The commitment to pay can feel very definite. The commitment to put a problem right should feel just as real.

I’m not suggesting a network will never have a fault. Things go wrong. The question is what happens when they do: whether someone investigates, whether the customer understands the next step, and whether the problem stays somebody’s responsibility.

Running a provider means dealing with technical constraints. It also means remembering that the person reporting a problem is trying to use the service they bought.

Explain the problem usefully

The connection to a property, the provider’s network, a router and the Wi-Fi around a home are different parts of the picture. Identifying which part is struggling matters because it changes what you do next.

But a technically correct explanation can still be unhelpful. “That’s your Wi-Fi” doesn’t tell someone how to check it, what a useful test would show, or what help is available.

I want the distinction to lead somewhere: a clear test, an explanation of the result, and a sensible next action. The customer shouldn’t have to know the answer before asking for help.

A diagnosis should open the next step, not close the conversation.

Keep the next step clear

A useful response answers a few ordinary questions. What do we know? What are we checking? Who is doing it? When should I expect to hear more?

Sometimes a provider needs another organisation to act. Sometimes the answer will involve equipment or conditions in the home. Neither is a reason to leave the customer guessing about where things stand.

Taking responsibility doesn’t mean claiming control over everything. It means owning the parts you control and explaining honestly how the other parts affect the route to a resolution.

Start before the sale

This responsibility starts with what we promise. A service description should help someone understand what they are choosing, including the equipment and the limits of what any one headline can tell them.

That’s part of why I’m interested in the way broadband is presented online. The product page and the support conversation are connected. One sets the expectation the other has to work with.

For me, the standard is an honest offer followed by useful help. If we expect customers to honour their agreement, delivering our side deserves the same attention.

Liam Mulryan

This is my personal position, not a statement of current Olilo prices, contract terms or support commitments.

The wider argument

Clear prices, a service that delivers and a genuine choice of commitment belong together.

Read about customer choice

See it differently?

I’m interested in where you agree, and where you’d challenge this.

Send me your take